Certifications AIGP CIPP/E CIPP/US CIPM CIPT AISL v0.1 All certifications Career plan How it works Pricing Log in Start free
Study guide

The complete AISL v0.1 study guide

What the exam asks, in what order to study it, how long it takes, what it costs and where candidates lose marks.

AI-generated image - a lawyer marks up a printed contract while a colleague points at the AI-drafted version on screen, the work AISL prepares you for
What it is

What is the AISL v0.1?

The AISL, AI Specialist, Legal, is the IAPP’s certification for lawyers, paralegals and legal operations professionals who use AI in their work. It covers how legal AI tools work and where they fail, how to deploy them in research, contracting, e-discovery and litigation, how to oversee them, and the professional and regulatory duties that apply when you do.

The IAPP opens its own training and exam in January 2027. The 22Academy course is available now, so you can sit the exam on the day it opens. It is version 0.1: built on the IAPP’s draft body of knowledge and updated when the final version is published.

22Academy has prepared candidates for IAPP exams since 2018. The AISL course follows the four domains of the draft in sixteen modules and 56 lessons, with more than 1,600 practice questions, twenty question structures and a full-length, timed trial exam. Start with a free assessment of 24 questions, about 15 minutes, to see where you stand. Full access starts at just €37 a week.

Format and fees

100questionsexpected, as for the AIGP
165minutesexpected, as for the AIGP
300of 500 to passexpected, scaled score
Jan2027the IAPP exam opens
v0.1course versionupdated to the final body of knowledge
€37a weekfull course access, cancel any time

The IAPP has not yet published the exam format. We expect it to follow the AIGP: 100 multiple-choice questions in 165 minutes, with a pass mark of 300 on a scale of 500. The 22Academy trial exam uses that format, so you train at the pace the real exam is likely to ask.

Exam fees, languages and the rules for keeping the certification are not yet published either.

Before you plan anything, find out what you already know. Free account, fifteen minutes.Free AISL v0.1 assessment
The body of knowledge

The four domains, and what each one asks

The IAPP publishes a body of knowledge for each certification: the list of competencies the exam is written from. For the AISL it is still a draft, with four domains and sixteen competencies, and the weight of each domain still to be set. The question counts below are the distribution of the 22Academy trial exam, set from the size of each domain in the draft.

The 22Academy course follows the draft competency by competency. Because the draft will change, so will the course: when the final version is published, AISL v0.1 is updated to it. If the final version differs too much for an update, a new version of the course replaces it and part of your progress may not carry over. Your access never stops. You hear from us beforehand, and if it happens you get an extra week of access.

1

Introduction to AI in the legal profession

about 18scored questions

How legal AI works and where it fails: legal-specific tools against general-purpose models, generative, agentic and predictive AI, and the risks that touch professional duty, from hallucination and bias to confidentiality, privilege, automation bias and shadow AI.

Where people lose marks

Hallucination is more than invented cases. The exam separates a fabricated source, a real source misread and sound sources with faulty reasoning, and asks which one occurred.

From the 22Academy bank · definition

Which term describes the following defect? A skeleton argument cites a real Court of Appeal judgment as authority for a rule that the court in that judgment expressly declined to adopt.

Twenty more like it, free
2

Understanding how AI models can be deployed in legal workflows

about 20scored questions

AI in the work itself: legal research and document review, drafting and contracting, due diligence, e-discovery, litigation support, predictive analysis and how judges use AI.

Where people lose marks

The workflow decides the risk. The same tool needs different checks in research, in a privilege review and in a court filing, and the exam asks which check fits the task.

From the 22Academy bank · scenario

A litigation associate gives a model the client's fact summary and four authorities and asks for a draft defence and counterclaim in the court's usual structure. The draft reads well, keeps its terminology consistent and pleads a missed delivery date alongside the other breaches. The filing deadline is in two days and the partner wants the draft filed as it stands. Which step is MOST important before the associate signs the pleading?

Twenty more like it, free
Screenshot of the 22Academy course - accuracy per domain and module, with the weakest module marked as the one to focus on now
Screenshot from results in the course
Domain by domain

Oversight is the largest domain. Is it yours?

In the draft, oversight and monitoring carries the most competencies, from governance structures and vendor assessment to prompting, guardrails and cost. The 22Academy trial exam gives it 40 percent of the questions. The course shows your accuracy per domain and per module, and points at the module to work on now.

3

Establishing oversight and monitoring in legal workflows

about 40scored questions

Oversight: AI strategy and governance structures, client-facing AI terms, acceptable use and model tiering, data handling, vendor assessment, monitoring and human verification, and prompting, guardrails and cost.

Where people lose marks

Who checks what. Human verification only counts when the reviewer has the competence, the time and the authority to reject the output, and the exam tests whether the checkpoint is real.

From the 22Academy bank · best answer

A fictional in-house legal team of six lawyers wants AI help with NDA review. It has no engineers, a modest budget and a settled NDA playbook. Which option BEST fits the team's constraints?

Twenty more like it, free
4

Ensuring AI use complies with ethical, contractual, statutory and regulatory requirements

about 22scored questions

The duties: professional conduct guidance in the United States, England and Wales, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, client communication and consent, disclosure to courts, supervision and candour, the EU AI Act and US state laws, and how AI changes fees, billing and indemnity insurance.

Where people lose marks

The duty stays with the lawyer. Using an AI tool, or a vendor's, never moves responsibility for a filing or for advice away from the person who signs it.

From the 22Academy bank · two-statement true or false

Statement I: A hallucinated authority that causes a client loss may found a negligence claim like any other, because the duty of care is unchanged. Statement II: In R (Ayinde) v Haringey the wasted costs order fell on the law centre alone, the barrister being referred to her regulator instead. Which option is correct?

Twenty more like it, free

Not using your IAPP membership? Pay only the $250 maintenance fee and keep $340 every two years.

Start AISL v0.1 free
The rules

The rules of professional conduct

Lawyers who use AI answer to the rules they already know: competence, confidentiality, candour to the court and supervision. Know these rules and the opinion that applies them to AI, and the scenario questions become readable.

Competence

ABA Model Rule 1.1

Understanding the benefits and risks of the AI tools you use, as part of the duty of competence.

Communication

ABA Model Rule 1.4

Telling clients when AI use matters to their matter, and when to ask for consent.

Fees

ABA Model Rule 1.5

Reasonable fees when AI makes the work faster, and what may be charged for the tools.

Confidentiality

ABA Model Rule 1.6

Protecting client information before it goes into an AI tool, above all one that learns from what you enter.

Candour to the tribunal

ABA Model Rule 3.3

Checking every citation and statement before it reaches a court.

Supervision

ABA Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3

Responsibility for the work of lawyers and staff, and for the AI tools they use.

Worth knowing

The guidance

Regulators and bar associations in England and Wales, Australia, New Zealand and Canada have issued guidance on AI use, and the EU AI Act adds statutory duties. Knowing what each one asks of a practitioner matters more than memorising its wording.

ABA Formal Opinion 512

The American Bar Association's opinion applying the existing Model Rules to generative AI tools.

Bar Council guidance on generative AI

What barristers in England and Wales must consider before using large language models.

SRA Risk Outlook on AI

The Solicitors Regulation Authority's view of the risks of AI in the legal market.

AI Judicial Guidance

Guidance for judicial office holders in England and Wales on using AI and spotting its use by others.

NSW Supreme Court Practice Note SC Gen 23

Rules on the use of generative AI in proceedings before the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

Federal Court of Canada notice on AI

Parties must declare when a document filed with the court was prepared with AI.

Decisions

Case law

Courts have already sanctioned lawyers for filings with citations an AI tool invented. These decisions show what the duty of candour and the duty to supervise mean once AI is in the workflow.

Mata v. Avianca, US District Court, 2023

Lawyers were sanctioned for filing case citations that a chatbot had invented.

Park v. Kim, US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2024

A lawyer was referred for discipline after citing a case that ChatGPT had made up.

Zhang v. Chen, Supreme Court of British Columbia, 2024

A lawyer was ordered to pay costs personally after citing two cases an AI tool invented.

Harber v. HMRC, First-tier Tribunal, 2023

A litigant relied on nine tribunal decisions that did not exist, produced by an AI tool.

Ayinde v. Haringey, High Court of England and Wales, 2025

The court warned that citing fictitious authorities can lead to contempt proceedings or referral to the regulator.

Valu v. Minister for Immigration, Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, 2025

A lawyer was referred to the regulator after filing submissions with AI-invented citations.

Always current

When the rules change, your course changes with them.

Every explanation in the course is stored once and linked to its source. When a regulation, a guideline or a decision changes, we update it in one place and every lesson that uses it is correct from that moment.

AI-generated image - a hand adds a new volume to a row of law books, as the course is updated when the rules change
The questions

How the questions are built, and how to read them

Exam questions come in a small number of structures, and a candidate who knows the content can still lose marks on the structure. The course tags every question with its structure; the technique is one tap away on each one, and every test shows whether you lost the mark on the content or on the type of question.

Two-statement true or false
Judge each statement on its own before you look at the options.
Best, most, primary
Underline the qualifier. Several options are defensible; one is the most complete.
Except, least, not
Three options are right. You are looking for the one that is wrong.
Only if, unless, provided that
Restate the rule without the condition, then test whether the outcome could happen without it.
Scenario
Read the question first, then the scenario. The scenario carries deliberate noise.
Definitions
The trap is a neighbouring term with one word changed.
Screenshot of the 22Academy course - score per question type, showing which type costs you the most marks
Screenshot from results in the course

Buy the exam voucher when you are ready, not before. It expires a year after you buy it.

Free AISL v0.1 assessment
How long it takes

How long does it take to prepare?

Lawyers and paralegals already know the professional rules; the technology and the oversight are what they add. Depending on your background you can be ready within the month at three hours a day, and many are faster.

The IAPP exam opens in January 2027. Start now and you are ready on the first day.

AISL v0.1 course€37 a week

Or €117 a month with a trial exam included.

Start the course

A four-week plan, at three hours a day

  1. Week 1The free assessment and domain I: how legal AI works, where it fails and the duties it touches21 h
  2. Week 2Domain II: research, review, contracting, e-discovery, litigation and predictive analysis. First module tests21 h
  3. Week 3Domain III: governance, policies, data, vendor assessment, monitoring, prompting and cost21 h
  4. Week 4Domain IV: conduct rules by jurisdiction, duties in the workflow, regulation and billing. Question structures and the trial exam21 h

A guideline. The course builds your own plan from your assessment and the hours you have.

Resources

Resources, and what each one is worth

ResourcePriceWorth it?
AISL draft body of knowledgeFreeEssential. Work through it competency by competency, and watch for the final version.
ABA Formal Opinion 512FreeThe clearest statement of how the existing rules apply to generative AI.
The EU AI Act itselfFreeRead the high-risk requirements and the duties of deployers.
IAPP AISL trainingNot yet publishedOpens in January 2027.
22Academy AISL course€37 a week or €117 a monthThe full course, the exam skills, the measurement and a trial exam. Available now.
22Academy trial exam€42, or free with a monthly planFull length in the expected format, with analysis by domain and by question type.
Ten mistakes

Ten mistakes that cost candidates the exam

  1. Treating it as a technology examIt tests judgement in legal work. You need to know what a tool does and where it fails, not how to build one.
  2. Trusting the citationAn AI answer with a source is not a verified answer. Check that the source says what the output claims.
  3. Forgetting privilegeClient information in a prompt can breach confidentiality and put privilege at risk. Ask where the data goes first.
  4. Treating all AI as oneGenerative, agentic and predictive AI fail in different ways and need different checks.
  5. Moving the duty to the vendorBuying a tool does not move responsibility. The lawyer who signs still answers for the work.
  6. Reading only the US rulesThe guidance covers England and Wales, Australia, New Zealand and Canada too, and the EU AI Act.
  7. Underrating oversightIt is the largest domain in the draft, and the most operational.
  8. Reading the scenario firstRead the question first. The scenario carries deliberate noise.
  9. Missing the qualifierMost, best, primary and except change the logic of the whole question.
  10. Waiting for the final body of knowledgeThe exam opens in January 2027. Start now and adjust when the final version is published.

If you fail, fail cheap. Ten trial exams cost less than one retake.

Buy a trial exam
Jobs and pay

What jobs does AISL v0.1 lead to, and what do they pay?

The AISL is for anyone in legal services whose work runs through AI tools: the lawyer who signs off AI-assisted work, the paralegal who runs the review, the legal operations team that chooses and monitors the tools. It leads into roles such as AI counsel, legal engineer and legal operations manager.

Employers and clients ask for it because it shows that you can use AI efficiently without breaching confidentiality, privilege or the duty of competence. Pay rises with the scope of the role.

Each role page shows which certifications it takes, in which order, and how long it takes.

Which first

AISL v0.1 or another certification: which first?

CertificationWhat it coversTake it when
AISL v0.1AI in legal practiceYou are a lawyer, paralegal or in legal operations and work with AI
AIGPAI governanceYour organisation builds or uses AI, and you govern it
CIPP/EEuropean data protection lawYou advise on the law, or want the legal foundation first
CIPP/USUnited States privacy law, federal and stateYou work with American data, clients or colleagues
CIPMRunning a privacy programmeYou run privacy rather than advise on it
CIPTPrivacy in technologyYou build or run the systems

Not sure? The career plan starts from the job you want.

Glossary

The terms the exam expects you to use precisely

Hallucination
An output of a generative model that is fluent and wrong, such as a citation to a case that does not exist.
Automation bias
The tendency to accept an automated output without the scrutiny you would give the same work from a person.
Shadow AI
AI tools used for work without the organisation's knowledge or approval.
Retrieval-augmented generation
A technique in which a model answers from documents retrieved for the question, not from its training alone.
Agentic AI
AI that plans and carries out steps towards a goal with limited human input.
Legal-specific model
A model built or tuned for legal work, usually on legal sources, as opposed to a general-purpose model.
Context window
The amount of text a model can take into account at once.
Prompt library
A shared set of tested prompts for recurring tasks.
Guardrail
A technical or procedural control that limits what an AI tool can do or produce.
Model tiering
Sorting AI tools by risk, so that each tier carries its own approval and checks.
AI inventory
The register of AI tools in use, with their owner, purpose and risk.
Technology-assisted review
The use of machine learning to rank or classify documents in e-discovery.
Elusion testing
Sampling the documents a review set aside, to estimate how many relevant ones were missed.
Electronically stored information
Information in electronic form that may have to be disclosed in litigation.
Privilege log
The list of documents withheld on grounds of privilege, with the reason for each.
Unauthorised practice of law
Providing legal services without authorisation, a risk when AI tools advise clients directly.
Legal engineer
A professional who designs and builds the technology and processes for legal work.
Data sovereignty
The principle that data is subject to the laws of the country where it is stored or processed.

Know the terms. Now prove it.

Free account, fifteen minutes, your score per domain.

Exam day

Exam day, and after

Pace

About 1 minute 40 seconds a question, if the format follows the AIGP. Flag and move on.

Eliminate first

Removing what is wrong is faster than hunting for what is right.

The qualifiers

Most, best, primary and except decide what is being asked.

The person who signs

Most scenarios ask what the responsible lawyer should do. Answer from that seat.

The IAPP has not yet published how the AISL is delivered. Its other exams can be taken online or at a test centre. If you sit online, do a full dry run the day before, and disconnect second screens and docking stations.

Not this time? Your progress in the course is still there.

Harder than the real thing, on purpose.

We believe a trial exam should hold a higher standard than the real one. Pass ours at the first attempt, sit the real exam within two weeks and fail it, and we refund what you paid for that trial exam.

Conditions
Questions

Questions people ask about the AISL v0.1

Is the AISL exam available yet?

Not yet. The IAPP opens its AISL training and certification in January 2027. The 22Academy course is available now, so you can study the whole body of knowledge before the exam opens and sit it on the first day. Lawyers who already work with AI tools will recognise much of the material; what the course adds is the structure, the vocabulary the exam expects and practice under exam conditions, so the first day is not your first look at the questions.

What does v0.1 mean?

The course is built on the IAPP's draft body of knowledge, and the final version is not yet published. When it is, we update the course to it, as we do with every course. If the final version differs too much for an update, we replace the course with a new version, and part of your progress may not carry over. Your access never stops. You hear from us before it happens, and if it does you get an extra week of access on top of what you paid for.

Who is the AISL for?

Lawyers, paralegals and legal operations professionals who use AI in their work or decide how others use it. It suits the in-house lawyer who signs off AI-assisted advice, the paralegal who runs an AI-supported review and the legal operations lead who chooses and monitors the tools. If your work runs through AI tools and you answer for the result, this is the certification that proves you can do it responsibly.

Do I need the AIGP first?

No. The AISL stands on its own. The two overlap in content, above all on how AI works, where it fails and what the EU AI Act requires, so holders of the AIGP will find parts of the course familiar and move faster. The IAPP has said nothing about credit between the two. If you govern AI across an organisation, the AIGP fits; if you use AI in legal work, the AISL does.

What will the exam look like?

The IAPP has not yet published the format. We expect it to follow the AIGP: 100 multiple-choice questions in 165 minutes, with a pass mark of 300 on a scale of 500. The 22Academy trial exam uses that format, so you train at the length and pace the real exam is likely to ask. If the IAPP publishes something different, the trial exam follows.

How is 22Academy different from IAPP training?

The IAPP's AISL training opens in January 2027; ours is available now. Beyond timing, we start from the fact that you already have access to the content, so we focus on getting it into your head rather than throwing more of it at you. We test your knowledge constantly, explain every concept in the form and length that suits you, and teach the exam skills: how the questions are built, what they are really asking and where the traps are. And we show you how to use your own AI app to study, which for this certification is practice in itself.

Is there a free option?

Yes. You can start your course for free and see whether the system suits you: the assessment and the first lesson are open without a card. When you want the rest, the course is €37 a week, or €117 a month with a trial exam included.

Can I stop at any time?

Yes. You pay for the weeks or months you study and cancel whenever you like; your access runs to the end of the period you paid for. If you come back within a year, your progress is still there.

Is 22Academy affiliated with the IAPP?

No. The IAPP owns the AISL and sets the exam. 22Academy prepares candidates for it independently, as it has prepared candidates for IAPP exams since 2018.

More in the FAQ.

Bas Hennis, founder of 22Academy

Questions about your study?

How to plan around a job, when to book the exam, whether you are ready: connect and ask. Support is free!

Start where you actually are

Free account, fifteen minutes, your score per domain.